Simon Dorante-Day – Man Claiming Charles and Camilla Son

Simon Dorante-Day is a Queensland grandfather who has spent nearly a decade claiming to be the secret son of King Charles III and Queen Camilla. Born in 1966 in Gosport, England, he alleges he was adopted out at around eight months old and raised in Portsmouth by Karen and David Day. His claims rest on family stories passed down by his grandmother, who worked as a cook for the Queen, and his own research into historical timelines and adoption records. Over the years, he has pursued legal action seeking DNA tests from members of the Royal Family, so far without success.

The 57-year-old, who works as an engineer and describes himself as a traditional healer, has recently escalated his campaign, announcing new legal efforts targeting Princes William and Harry. As Charles and Camilla undertook their Australia tour in October 2024, royal protection officers were reportedly placed on heightened alert amid Dorante-Day’s public statements and media appearances. The claims remain unproven, with no official response from the Royal Family and no judicial validation reported to date.

Who is Simon Dorante-Day?

Dorante-Day presents himself as a man whose life has been shaped by a secret he only fully uncovered as an adult. According to his account, his grandmother—who worked as a cook for the Queen alongside her husband, a royal gardener—repeatedly told him during his childhood that he was the son of Prince Charles and Camilla. His adoptive mother later confirmed that the name “Simon Charles” was imposed as a condition of his adoption by his biological parents.

He grew up in Portsmouth, England, raised by Karen Day, a hairdresser, and David Day, a truck driver, with no knowledge of his alleged royal parentage during his formative years. As a child, he recalls visits to properties in Portsmouth accompanied by a woman he believes was Camilla, with protection officers nearby. He moved to Australia at some point and now lives in Queensland, where he works as an engineer while studying law.

• Claims birth at Royal Hospital Haslar in Gosport, which he alleges delivered no babies during the 1960s
• States his birth certificate names were fictitious
• Says the name “Simon Charles” was a condition imposed by his biological parents at adoption
• Describes himself as a traditional healer and law student in Queensland
• Positions himself as the “true heir” based on facial resemblance to Charles
• Primarily seeks DNA tests rather than kingship
• Posts regularly on Facebook, challenging royal paternity through facial comparisons

What are the latest news updates on Simon Dorante-Day?

The most recent developments centre on Dorante-Day’s escalating legal efforts and his public warnings during the King’s 2024 Australia tour. In late 2024, as King Charles and Queen Camilla prepared for their tour of Australia and Samoa, royal protection officers were placed on “red alert” amid concerns about potential encounters with Dorante-Day. He had publicly announced his intention to take legal action and had been sharing what he described as new photo evidence through media interviews and social media posts.

Earlier in 2024, Dorante-Day accused Queensland Police of neglecting his human rights under the Queensland Human Rights Act. He framed his case around adoptee rights, arguing that he deserved access to the truth about his origins. Times of India indicated that he cited four years of family harassment and threats as justification for his legal actions.

News coverage from 7news.com.au documented his announcement of a new legal bid targeting not Charles and Camilla directly, but Princes William and Harry. This shift in strategy marked a new phase in his decade-long pursuit of paternity verification. However, no confirmed lawsuit outcomes or DNA results have been reported in the available coverage.

Royal Family Response and Public Awareness

The Royal Family has maintained silence on Dorante-Day’s claims throughout the years. While the palace does not typically comment on unsubstantiated allegations of this nature, the heightened security measures during the October 2024 tour suggest that royal staff took the situation seriously as a matter of protocol rather than endorsement of the claims.

Media coverage has varied in tone. Some outlets have reported his claims factually as news developments, while others have been more dismissive. Times of India described the royal household as being on “red alert,” a phrase that has been widely cited in subsequent coverage. Dorante-Day himself has used media appearances to share what he calls photo evidence and to reiterate his demands for DNA testing.

Who does Simon Dorante-Day claim is his mother?

Dorante-Day claims that Queen Camilla is his biological mother. According to his account, Camilla allegedly vanished from Britain’s social scene for approximately nine months before his claimed birth in 1966. He suggests this disappearance was to conceal a pregnancy resulting from her relationship with Prince Charles, who was 17 at the time and Camilla was 18.

He supports this claim with references to Charles’s whereabouts during that period. In 1966, Prince Charles was sent to Timbertop school in Victoria, Australia, a fact that Dorante-Day cites as potentially significant to his birth circumstances. He alleges this placement coincided with the need to keep Charles distant from Britain during a sensitive time.

The claims also extend to documentation. Dorante-Day states that his birth certificate contains fictitious names for his parents, and that the Royal Hospital Haslar, where he claims to have been born, did not deliver babies during that decade. These allegations, combined with his grandmother’s repeated assertions during his childhood, form the basis of his identification of Camilla as his mother.

Evidence Presented by Dorante-Day

Dorante-Day points to several pieces of evidence to support his claim that Camilla is his mother. His grandmother’s testimony is central to his narrative. She worked for the Queen as a cook and, according to Dorante-Day, consistently told him throughout his childhood that he was the child of Charles and Camilla. His adoptive mother reportedly confirmed that the condition of his adoption included the requirement that his first name be Simon Charles.

He also cites physical resemblance as evidence. Dorante-Day asserts that his face matches the left side of King Charles’s face more closely than either Prince William’s or Prince Harry’s features do. He has shared comparative images on social media, particularly on Facebook, where he posts about his claims and challenges the paternity of the current princes.

However, it is important to note that no independent verification of these claims has been reported. The Royal Family has not acknowledged them, no DNA testing has been conducted with royal cooperation, and the alleged birth records remain private or disputed.

Historical Context of the Claim

Charles and Camilla met in 1965, when Charles was 16 and Camilla was 17. Their relationship developed during a period when royal protocols and public expectations differed significantly from contemporary standards. The timeline Dorante-Day presents aligns with historical records showing Charles’s departure for Australia in 1966.

Some commentators have noted that certain aspects of Dorante-Day’s narrative would require conditions that are difficult to verify or disprove given the lack of public records and the passage of time. The Royal Household does not comment on family matters of this nature, leaving claims like these without official confirmation or denial.

What is known about Simon Dorante-Day’s personal life and legal actions?

Beyond his royal claims, Dorante-Day lives in Queensland, Australia, where he works as an engineer. He describes himself as a traditional healer and is also pursuing law studies. He is reportedly a grandfather, though specific details about his family are not widely reported in available sources.

His legal journey spans nearly a decade. He has consistently sought DNA tests from King Charles and Queen Camilla, a pursuit that has not resulted in any successful engagement with the Royal Family. His recent shift toward targeting Princes William and Harry represents a new approach, though the outcome remains uncertain.

Legal Proceedings and Complaints

Dorante-Day’s legal efforts have included formal complaints against Queensland Police, which he accuses of neglecting his human rights under the Queensland Human Rights Act. He frames his case around adoptee rights, arguing that he has the right to know the truth about his origins and that authorities have failed to assist him in his pursuit. Simon Dorante-Day has spent nearly a decade pursuing these claims without success.

In 2024, amid heightened tensions around the royal tour, he warned that he intended to confront Charles and Camilla directly, citing ongoing harassment and threats he claims to have experienced. This warning contributed to the security arrangements during the tour, though no confrontation was reported.

No confirmed lawsuit outcomes have been reported. The legal landscape remains fluid, and Dorante-Day continues to announce new initiatives through social media and media interviews. Some outlets have described his claims as lacking substance, but he maintains his position that the truth deserves to be investigated.

Online Presence and Self-Presentation

Dorante-Day maintains an active Facebook presence where he posts regularly about his claims. His profile describes him as working in healing and studying law. He shares facial comparison images and posts that challenge the paternity of Prince William and Prince Harry, positioning himself as the true heir.

He has also appeared in video interviews, including on YouTube, where he has detailed his story and presented what he considers to be evidence of the cover-up. His 2016 debut interview reportedly included claims of “concrete proof,” though no independent verification has emerged.

Photos circulated in media coverage show him alongside images of King Charles, highlighting the physical resemblance he promotes. However, such comparisons do not constitute proof of parentage and remain a matter of interpretation.

How has this story developed over time?

1. 1966: Claimed birth to Prince Charles and Camilla; Dorante-Day states he was born in Gosport, England, and adopted out at around eight months old
2. Early years: Grandmother, who worked as a cook for the Queen, repeatedly tells him he is the son of Charles and Camilla during his childhood
3. 2016: Dorante-Day gives his first major interview, claiming “concrete proof” of a royal cover-up
4. 2016–2024: Pursues legal action seeking DNA tests from Charles and Camilla without success
5. 2024: Accuses Queensland Police of neglecting human rights; frames case around adoptee rights
6. October 2024: King Charles and Queen Camilla’s Australia/Samoa tour begins; royal household placed on “red alert” amid Dorante-Day’s public warnings and media appearances
7. Late 2024: Announces new legal bid targeting Princes William and Harry instead of Charles and Camilla
8. November 2024: News coverage emerges regarding lawsuit developments and ongoing claims

The timeline reflects a gradual escalation in both Dorante-Day’s public profile and the scope of his legal ambitions. What began as personal claims shared with media has evolved into a sustained campaign involving law enforcement complaints, public warnings about royal tours, and expanded legal targeting of the wider Royal Family.

What is established and what remains unclear?

The factual foundation of Dorante-Day’s claims rests largely on his own statements and those of family members. No independent verification of his biological parentage exists in publicly available sources. The Royal Family has not acknowledged the claims, and no DNA test results have been reported.

What is verifiable is that he lives in Australia, has engaged legal representation, has made statements to media, and has attracted attention from royal protection services during official tours. The gap between these established facts and the extraordinary claims he makes about his parentage remains substantial.

How does this fit into broader royal and media contexts?

Dorante-Day’s claims emerge against a backdrop of enduring public fascination with the British Royal Family’s history, particularly around relationships and succession. The narrative of Charles and Camilla’s early relationship has been well documented, and their eventual marriage in 2005 was a significant moment in royal history.

Media coverage of Dorante-Day reflects broader patterns in reporting on royal-related claims. Outlets balance the newsworthiness of his statements against the lack of verification, with some taking a more sensational approach while others maintain a neutral, fact-reporting stance. The description of royal staff being on “red alert” originated in some coverage and has been repeated widely.

The legal dimension of Dorante-Day’s campaign also reflects contemporary discussions around adoptee rights and access to birth information. By framing his claims through the lens of human rights and legal entitlement to information, he positions himself within broader social movements rather than simply as a royal claimant.

For context on historical events during the relevant time period, readers may find resources like the Imperial War Museum London: Free Entry, Hours, Map & Guide useful for understanding the era in which these events reportedly occurred.

What are the sources and what do they say?

“Convince[d] he is their illegitimate son” — Daily Mail coverage of Dorante-Day’s claims and activities

“I Believe I Am Prince Charles & Camilla’s Secret Son” — Title of YouTube interview appearances by Dorante-Day

The primary sources for information about Simon Dorante-Day include Australian news outlets such as 7news.com.au, international coverage from Times of India, and Dorante-Day’s own social media presence on Facebook and YouTube. Each source carries different credibility considerations.

News organisations report his claims as developments but do not verify them. Social media profiles present his perspective directly. No official sources, palace statements, or court documents have emerged to confirm or deny the claims in publicly available reports.

Coverage has been consistent in noting the lack of DNA evidence, official confirmation, or judicial validation. Some outlets have used strong language in describing the claims, while maintaining that the story merited reporting given the public interest and legal developments.

Summary

Simon Dorante-Day presents himself as the secret son of King Charles III and Queen Camilla, born in 1966 and adopted out as an infant. His claims are based on family stories from his grandmother, who worked for the Queen, and his own research into historical timelines and alleged adoption anomalies. He has pursued DNA tests and legal action for nearly a decade without success, recently expanding his efforts to target Princes William and Harry.

Royal protection services were heightened during the October 2024 Australia tour amid his public warnings and media appearances. The Royal Family has not responded to the claims, and no judicial outcomes or DNA results have been confirmed in available reporting. Coverage varies from factual news reporting to more dismissive characterizations of his allegations.

For information about government support programs relevant to residents in similar situations, see 450 Cost of Living Payment 2025 – Official Status and Facts.

Frequently Asked Questions